Workshop

Sunday, June 25, 2017

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 1
Are We Afraid of What We’ll Find?  Using Real Buildings to Improve ASHRAE Standards and Publications

HVAC&R Systems and Equipment
201A (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Joy Altwies, Ph.D., P.E., University of Wisconsin-Madison
Technical Committee: 2.8 Building Environmental Impacts and Sustainability
This workshop explains the results of a recent ASHRAE research project, 1627-RP, that studied the actual performance of buildings built using the ASHRAE 30% AEDG for schools and offices. Can we replicate the study to investigate the performance of buildings built using Standard 90.1? What will we find? Can the results be used to improve our future standards and publications?

1  Highlights of 1627-RP: Actual Energy Performance of Small Office and K-12 School Buildings Designed to Meet the 30% ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides

Dennis Jones, P.E., Group14 Engineering Inc.
This workshop discusses the results of 1627-RP, completed in 2016. This research investigated the effectiveness of 30% Advanced Energy Design Guidelines (AEDGs) for K-12 schools and small office buildings, determined the factors common to well and poorly performing buildings and provided recommendations for how future AEDGs could be made more effective.

2  Potential New Research on the Actual Energy Performance of Buildings Designed to Comply with ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010

J. Kevin Cross, P.E., Honeywell
Using the recent success of 1627-RP as a template, this workshop discusses the potential for additional research projects that identify statistically-significant samples of real buildings built using Std 90.1-2010. Can this type of research be replicated to provide real-world input to future ASHRAE Standards and publications? What guidance can the actual performance of these buildings provide?

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 2
Are You Ready For 21st Century Building Automation?

Fundamentals and Applications
101B (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Marcelo Acosta, P.Eng., Armstrong Fluid Technologies
Technical Committee: 1.4 Control Theory and Application
CoSponsor: 7.5 Smart Building Systems
In this session the panel engages the audience in exploring the obstacles and solutions to the disappointingly low levels of adoption of new technologies for building automation, despite their big potential. Why do most designers still opt for the inefficient old schemes unless pushed by legislation? Is energy too cheap? Are owners and operators ready? Does ASHRAE or YEA membership make a difference in your view? Whether you are a Baby Boomer, GenXer, or Millennial, are you ready to adopt new building control technologies?

1  Potentials and Disappointments: The Slow Adoption of Advanced Building Automation

Marcelo Acosta, P.Eng., Armstrong Fluid Technologies
Facts about the adoption rates for different technologies presented at almost every conference this century will be analyzed with the audience as well as their potential obstacles and solutions. Technologies: smart equipment, cloud optimization, automated diagnostics, total integration, performance predictive controls, occupant behavior prediction and self-learning controls.

2  Are Millennials Ready for Advanced Building Automation?

Michelle Shadpour, SC Engineers, Inc.
The findings of a survey among Millennials exploring their slow adoption of new technologies is presented for discussion. Is the main obstacle lack of self-confidence, budgeted time or authority? Does YEA membership make a difference? Does the knowledge of successful stories remove concerns? Are Millennials too busy learning ductwork design to worry about controls? Is higher environmental conscience a strong enough driver in this group? Let's review together!

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 3
Bringing Standard 90.1 to the World: The Addition of Climate Zone 0

Fundamentals and Applications
103AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Andy Cochrane, Industrial Air Inc.
Sponsor: Chapter Technology Transfer Committee
Discussion about the performance of buildings shows increasing connectedness of critical energy, power and water issues. Combined with analysis of environmental trends, these shared issues define an expanding international role for ASHRAE standards. Standard 169-2013, provides climate data for building performance assessment and includes data and maps for Climate Zone 0. This presentation explores Climate Zone 0 and changes to 90.1. Comparing and contrasting building performance requirements for Climate Zone 0 with previous editions, focusing on building envelope and air leakage impacting HVAC decisions and building energy performance. It concludes with discussion of areas ASHRAE standards should address building performance.

1  Bringing ASHRAE 90.1 to the World: The Addition of Climate Zone 0

Chris Mathis, Mathis Consulting
Until recently, the flagship standard on building energy performance – ASHRAE 90.1 – was silent on its application into these extremely hot climates. This presentation explores the new Climate Zone 0 and the recent changes to Standard 90.1 to expand its building performance guidance to these international locations. The presentation compares and contrasts critical building performance requirements for Climate Zone 0 with previous editions of the standard. It especially focuses on key building envelope and air leakage requirements that critically impact HVAC decisions and ultimate building energy performance. The session concludes with a discussion of additional areas where ASHRAE should expand its standards to address targeted building performance topics in CZ 0 and worldwide.

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 4
Common Commissioning Terminology for the Building Industry: An International Overview

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
203AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Livio de Santoli, P.Eng., AiCARR
Sponsor: AiCARR, CIBSE, SSPC 202
Commissioning is a process for ensuring that a system is designed and operated as intended; commissioning helps achieve larger goals of sustainable design and operation, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effectiveness, efficient use of investments, minimizing overall maintenance and utility costs, component life reliability and performance expectations. AiCARR, ASHRAE and CIBSE have agreed to draw from definitions and terminology that appear in their publications or in their other resources for the purpose of harmonization by developing a first collective work on the topic. This workshop presents the state of terminology in each country and a proposal for a common overview.

1  ASHRAE Overview

Walter Grondzik, P.E., ASHRAE
Commissioning is a process for ensuring that a system is designed and operated as intended; commissioning helps achieve larger goals of sustainable design and operation, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effectiveness, efficient use of investments, minimizing overall maintenance and utility costs, component life reliability and performance expectations. AiCARR, ASHRAE and CIBSE have agreed to draw from definitions and terminology that appear in their publications or in their other resources for the purpose of harmonization by developing a first collective work on the topic. This workshop presents the state of terminology in each country and a proposal for a common overview.

2  CIBSE Overview

Hywel Davies, CIBSE
Commissioning is a process for ensuring that a system is designed and operated as intended; commissioning helps achieve larger goals of sustainable design and operation, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effectiveness, efficient use of investments, minimizing overall maintenance and utility costs, component life reliability and performance expectations. AiCARR, ASHRAE and CIBSE have agreed to draw from definitions and terminology that appear in their publications or in their other resources for the purpose of harmonization by developing a first collective work on the topic. This workshop presents the state of terminology in each country and a proposal for a common overview.

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 5
Engineers of Trial: You Decide Guilt or Innocence

Fundamentals and Applications
102AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Michael Cooper, P.E., MCC
Technical Committee: 7.2 HVAC&R Construction & Design Build Technologies
CoSponsor: 1.7 Business, Management & General Legal Education
The session presents an actual case in which a practicing engineer was sued for negligence and malpractice. The workshop takes to form of each side of the case being presented, prosecution and defense and then the audience will breakout into smaller groups to discuss. Each group will have one individual speak for the group to convey what was discussed about the points of the different sides of the argument and then state if the group felt the engineer was guilty or innocent. At the end of the session, the actual decision is revealed.

1  The Case for the Plaintiff

E. Mitchell Swann, P.E., MDCSystems
The arguments for a guilty verdict are presented. The list of breaches of the contract and/or law are presented and the recommended remedy being sought is expressed. The damages to the plaintiff are presented that will include direct and consequential damages.

2  The Case for the Defense

Michael Connor, P.E., WSP
The arguments for a not guilty verdict are presented. The counter arguments for each of the list of breaches are expressed as well as the argument that the damages sought are excessive.

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 6
Science and Technology for the Built Environment Writer's Workshop: Authoring Research Papers with Impact

Research Summit
202AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Reinhard Radermacher, Ph.D., University of Maryland
Sponsor: Publication and Education Council
Hosted by the editorial staff and publishers of the ASHRAE archival journal, Science and Technology for the Built Environment, this workshop aims to teach authors of technical and research papers to write with maximum impact in a manner to maximize citations.

1  Writing for Maximum Impact

Alexa Flood, Taylor and Francis
Finally getting your work on paper is only half the battle. Sure, having a published work is good to have on your resume, but having impactful work can make a career. Learn how to write research papers in a way that will garner citations, and get maximum mileage out of your work. This workshop touches upon the importance of selecting the best journal match for your work, how to maximize your article for hits from search engines and when to publish using open access. It also explains how to better understand writing about both methodology and research findings.

2  Writing Research Papers that Get Published.

Alexa Flood, Taylor and Francis
Mary Baugher, University of Maryland
Avoid the pitfalls that plague many authors who submit papers to research journals. Learn how to write a compelling abstract, the importance of proper formatting and grammar, surviving the plagiarism cross-check and addressing reviewers' comments in a productive way.

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 7
Status of Standards and Codes in the USA, In View of the Application of Low GWP Refrigerants

Refrigeration
201B (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Steven Eckels, Ph.D., Kansas State University Institute for Environmental Research
Sponsor: REFRIGERATION COMMITTEE
CoSponsor: MTG.LowGWP Lower Global Warming Potential Alternative Refrigerants
Today there is work ongoing in different standard and code making committees related to the implementation of lower GWP refrigerants. This workshop aims to give a transparent view for both US and non US members about the status and work in progress of standards and codes including SNAP.

1  Status of ASHRAE 15, Related Codes and SNAP

Phillip Johnson, P.E., Daikin Applied
A status update on committee activities to update ASHRAE Standard 15 will set up the workshop discussion to follow. The relationships, interactions and relative timing between ASHRAE 15, building codes and US EPA SNAP is reviewed.

2  Status of UL Standards and Related Codes

Brian Rodgers, Underwriters Laboratories
A status update on committee, working group and technical panel activities to update various UL standards. Interconnection and process between UL, CSA, ANCE, CANENA, and IEC is reviewed.

Monday, June 26, 2017

11:00 AM-12:00 PM
Workshop 8
Opaque OPRs Produce Obscure Objectives

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
201B (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: E. Mitchell Swann, P.E., MDCSystems
Technical Committee: 7.3 Operation and Maintenance Management
CoSponsor: 1.7 Business, Management & General Legal Education
To have a successful project it is essential to bridge the communication gap among owner, designer and commissioning provider. This workshop focuses on the elements of an effective Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR). Attendees, working in small groups, will craft a section of an OPR in response to a demanding yet visionary owner. The groups will then come together, compare their OPRs, and engage in an interactive discussion designed to meld the best ideas into a single high-quality document.

1  Owner's Perspective of an OPR

Wayne Webster, Princess Towers, Inc.
This workshop includes the building owner's perspective on the definition of OPR, why the OPR is important and summarizes their responsibilities in developing the OPR. Key points to be discussed are: The communication gap between Owner, Designer and Cx provider; Who takes (or should take) the lead? The audience will break into small groups and provide an opaque OPR. The Owner and Cx provider will have a pre-written script and play the role of an Owner of a commercial office building. The groups will interview the Owner and rewrite the section of the OPR to reflect the actual needs of the Owner. The Cx provider will then present an example of an effective OPR, stimulate open discussion and questions and compare the example OPR against a selected group's document.

2  Cx Provider's Perspective of an OPR

Mina Agarabi, P.E., Agarabi Engineering PLLC
An experienced commissioning (Cx) provider shares their perspective on the definition of OPR, why the OPR is important and summarizes the essential components. Key points to be discussed are: A clear definition of the Owner's expectations reduces the risk of unclear intent, unfulfilled expectations and unnecessary disputes; An OPR that reflects the actual needs of the Owner, the users or occupants, and facility staff is needed for Cx to be successful.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

9:45 AM-10:45 AM
Workshop 9
How to Design, Construct and Operate Net Zero Hospitals AND Save Money

Net Zero Energy Buildings: The International Race to 2030
203AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Francis Mills, CEng, Frank Mills Consulting
Technical Committee: 9.6 Healthcare Facilities
Sponsor: SSPC 170
CoSponsor: 2.8 Building Environmental Impacts and Sustainability
Hospitals are high energy users and produce a lot of carbon emissions. However recent research has shown that hospitals can be designed and operated as 'Nett Zero Energy' or even Positive energy and this can be done without diverting funds from Healthcare. This workshop invites ASHRAE members to take part in a brainstorming session to see what are the best methods toward Nett Zero and what differences apply between different locations, countries and climate regions. Issue such as local Standards, codes and traditions will be raised and any other potential obstacles to the ZERO target.

1  How to Achieve Net Zero Energy Hospitals

Wim Maassen, Royal Haskoning DHV
Research in Europe has shown thatnthere are cost effective strategies to achieve Nett Zero Hospitals. This will be discussed in terms of its relevance to all countries.

2  Strategies to Net Zero Hospitals

Frank Mills, Low Carbon Design Consultants
The UK Low energy hospital study and other studies show that Nett Zero can be cost effective and beneficial.

Register now!