Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation

Sunday, June 25, 2017

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Forum 1
Commissioning Experience with California Title 24 VAV Lab Exhaust

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
101A (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Victor Neuman, P.E., Laboratory Exhaust Certification LLC
Technical Committee: 9.10 Laboratory Systems
California Title 24 Regulation has mandated for the first time that all new laboratories in the state have variable air volume (VAV) exhausts. This provides a wide variety of experiences from owners, engineers, contractors and commissioning agents. This forum confidentially discusses real world results in California for VAV lab exhausts and discusses the upcoming 2018-2019 revisions to California Title 24 for VAV lab exhausts.

  Commissioning Experience with California Title 24 VAV Lab Exhaust

Victor Neuman, P.E., Laboratory Exhaust Certification LLC

8:00 AM-9:00 AM
Workshop 4
Common Commissioning Terminology for the Building Industry: An International Overview

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
203AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Livio de Santoli, P.Eng., AiCARR
Sponsor: AiCARR, CIBSE, SSPC 202
Commissioning is a process for ensuring that a system is designed and operated as intended; commissioning helps achieve larger goals of sustainable design and operation, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effectiveness, efficient use of investments, minimizing overall maintenance and utility costs, component life reliability and performance expectations. AiCARR, ASHRAE and CIBSE have agreed to draw from definitions and terminology that appear in their publications or in their other resources for the purpose of harmonization by developing a first collective work on the topic. This workshop presents the state of terminology in each country and a proposal for a common overview.

1  ASHRAE Overview

Walter Grondzik, P.E., ASHRAE
Commissioning is a process for ensuring that a system is designed and operated as intended; commissioning helps achieve larger goals of sustainable design and operation, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effectiveness, efficient use of investments, minimizing overall maintenance and utility costs, component life reliability and performance expectations. AiCARR, ASHRAE and CIBSE have agreed to draw from definitions and terminology that appear in their publications or in their other resources for the purpose of harmonization by developing a first collective work on the topic. This workshop presents the state of terminology in each country and a proposal for a common overview.

2  CIBSE Overview

Hywel Davies, CIBSE
Commissioning is a process for ensuring that a system is designed and operated as intended; commissioning helps achieve larger goals of sustainable design and operation, Life Cycle Cost (LCC) effectiveness, efficient use of investments, minimizing overall maintenance and utility costs, component life reliability and performance expectations. AiCARR, ASHRAE and CIBSE have agreed to draw from definitions and terminology that appear in their publications or in their other resources for the purpose of harmonization by developing a first collective work on the topic. This workshop presents the state of terminology in each country and a proposal for a common overview.

9:45 AM-10:45 AM
Seminar 2
Commissioning Complex Labs: Stories from the Field

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
102AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Wade H. Conlan, P.E., Hanson Professional Services
Technical Committee: 9.10 Laboratory Systems
CoSponsor: 7.7 Testing and Balancing
Commissioning on complex labs follows the same processes as other buildings but there are unique systems and challenges that are presented when dealing with laboratories. This seminar covers a case study of a major cancer research center and the balance between optimization and safety. In addition, an in depth look at lessons learned from the field when Commissioning Biosafety Level 3 laboratories.

1  Lab Building Case Study: Safety Vs. Energy Conservation

Justin Garner, P.E., Engineered Air Balance Company, Inc.
This seminar focuses on a specific project for a new laboratory building for a major cancer research institution. Specifically, the presentation discusses energy recovery, demand based ventilation, occupancy sequencing and building pressurization strategies that were implemented and the lessons learned during commissioning of the HVAC systems.

2  Continuous Improvement of Commissioning / Certification of Bsl-3 Laboratories

Carol Donovan, Alares LLC
There are a multitude of challenges associated with designing, constructing and operating BSL-3 laboratories. The combination of user expectations, regulatory compliance, risk considerations and contractor interpretation of specifications can result in a delay in opening these laboratories from 1-2 years or longer. This presentation discusses the practical implications of commissioning BSL3 laboratories. It will provide an overview of the different organizations providing regulatory compliance, discuss the various risk factors involved with programmatic decision making, review engineered systems and ventilation strategies and the impact these decisions have on operational strategies. This presentation highlights essential documentation for sustainable operation.

1:30 PM-3:00 PM
Seminar 13
Building EQ: ASHRAE and APPA Adapting to Energy Challenges Today

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
101B (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Hoy Bohanon, P.E., Hoy Bohanon Engineering, PLLC
Sponsor: Building EQ Committee
ASHRAE is in the process of introducing an updated version of Building EQ. A web portal will be available soon for data entry and building energy evaluation. Concurrent with this offering, APPA is promoting the partnership with ASHRAE to its members. A college course is being offered through the student branches. Come and hear how an alliance between ASHRAE Chapters, ASHRAE Student Branches, University Facilities Managers (APPA) and University Instructors rolls into action this fall.

1  The New Building EQ

Hugh Crowther, Swegon North America, Inc.
Building EQ has many new features and offers support for ASHRAE members in their energy savings efforts. The most prominent change is that data will be entered through a web portal rather than filling out a spreadsheet. New marketing tools will be provided to members as the year progresses.

2  Adapt Building EQ

Michael Brandemuehl, University of Colorado
Adapt Building EQ provides a college senior-level undergraduate or graduate course on building energy auditing and analysis using the ASHRAE Building EQ rating system as a learning framework. Students will experience project-based learning through hands-on engineering in real buildings under the guidance of industry professionals. The course is nominally three semester credit hours. It involves 10 weeks of classroom instruction followed by five weeks of hands-on field work in teams under the guidance of local industry mentors. Course content will be freely available through ASHRAE student branches. Students will be expected to purchase some resources through ASHRAE with student discounts.

3  ASHRAE's Partnership with APPA

Daniel Redmond, Carleton University
The ASHRAE Building EQ program benefits owners and managers of building portfolios. For each building, the program provides an energy rating along with actionable recommendations to improve building performance. These recommendations are made by a professional assessment of a building’s energy use as determined by In Operation and/or As Designed ratings method. Building EQ is the only rating system that offers both methods with a consistent baseline to make comparisons along with detailed actionable recommendations. ASHRAE entered into an agreement with APPA in July 2016 with the commitment to cooperate across many areas including implementing Building EQ on university campuses.

4  APPA's Opportunity and Expectations of Building EQ

Charles Scott, Illinois State University
APPA is the preeminent organization for university facilities management in North America. APPA has 15,000 members at 1400 institutions. APPA is keenly interested in transforming the way we look at performance of buildings. APPA entered into an agreement with ASHRAE to cooperate in areas of mutual interest. Building EQ offers one opportunity to advance facilities management and help positively shape our current and future built environment.

1:30 PM-3:00 PM
Seminar 14
Commissioning of Commercial Kitchen Ventilation Systems, Including Examples of Real World Successes and Failures

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
201B (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Francis Kohout, P.E., Cyclone Energy Group
Technical Committee: 5.10 Kitchen Ventilation
CoSponsor: 7.9 Building Commissioning
This seminar features presentations describing some of the unique and challenging situations that must be considered as part of the commissioning process for Commercial Kitchen Ventilation (CKV) systems.

1  What Is Commercial Kitchen Ventilation Commissioning?

Donald Fisher, P.Eng., Fisher Consultants
The commercial kitchen ventilation (CKV) system is just that, a system, complete with hoods, exhaust and makeup air fans, makeup air conditioning and delivery and in many cases, demand-based controls. Simply stated, when commissioning (Cx) is compromised, CKV performance falls short of client expectations! Unfortunately, commissioning a CKV system is a complex, multi-phase task not always understood by the design community. Many times, the failure of an exhaust hood to capture effluent from the cooking process could have been mitigated through effective commissioning. This is a high-level perspective on the commissioning process applied to a commercial kitchen.

2  Overall CKV Commissioning and the Critical Role of Testing and Balancing

Jason Brown, Melink Corp.
What are the common issues typically found while performing a test and balance of a CKV system? Several examples are presented that display the common issues found when performing a test and balance as part of both new construction and rebalancing of existing sites due to inadequate design, improper installation and poor maintenance.


3  Commercial Kitchen Ventilation Operation and Performance: Reality Check from the Field

Michael Morgan, Captive Aire Systems, Inc.
Commercial kitchen ventilation systems (CKV) are a subset within the overall building HVAC, which requires a proper approach to system design, installation and commissioning for operation and performance. System design, quality products and integration are critical; however, the realities of field installations shows that, “where the rubber meets the road, your mileage may vary.” This seminar highlights many of the common issues discovered in the field when performing a system design verification to ensure proper and sustainable operation.

Monday, June 26, 2017

8:00 AM-9:30 AM
Seminar 18
Bridging the Information Gaps to Operation Management

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
102AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Robyn Ellis, City of Hamilton - Public Works
Technical Committee: 7.3 Operation and Maintenance Management
Sponsor: 7.8 Owning and Operating Costs
CoSponsor: 7.9 Building Commissioning
This seminar describes innovative approaches to bridging the information gaps that often occur throughout the project cycle, obscuring system intent, critical operating information (set-points, flow rates, etc.), performance history, training materials. Case studies include commissioning with a tablet-based information portal on the owner's cloud, semi-automated data-logging for FDD messaging and searchable information archiving. Impacts include improved energy efficiency and reduced operating costs. This seminar provides diverse perspectives from the owner, the consulting engineer and the researcher.

1  Bridging the Information Gap during Commissioning and Project Turnover to Operations

Chuck Dale-Derks, P.E., McClure Engineering
Participants will gain a better understanding of commissioning deliverables from the CxA and/or construction team to be passed to operations. An effective operation and maintenance program benefits when all relevant deliverables are received at project turnover, bridging a commonly experienced gap in information. It is also important to identify what documentation will benefit the relevant committees in their guidance to professionals in creating and receiving those deliverables. ASHRAE recently issued Guideline 1.4 on the Systems Manual. Is this a good starting point for documentation or just another formalization of process? This speaker examines the consultant's perspective.

2  Commissioning Documentation for Operations Management

John Gibbemeyer, P.E., George Mason University
Higher education projects are normally required to obtain a LEED certification. Embracing LEED requirements is challenging; but many are now convinced that it can significantly improve operations! LEED projects produce commissioning deliverables that are currently underutilized in bridging the gap to operations management. A higher level of awareness and improved implementation of the Final Commissioning Report and Systems Manual deliverables will greatly improve communication from schematic design through long term operation of the building. Developing an Owner’s Project Requirement (OPR) early will ensure that what is proposed in the design and constructed can be maintained well at a low cost.

3  Building Re-Tuning with Automated Data-Logger Networks

Paul Reale, Building Performance Lab, City University of New York
It is often said that improvements in building operations can yield 10 – 20% energy savings. Effective Building Re-tuning (BRT) techniques developed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory that identify energy efficiency opportunities rely on data from a Building Automation Systems. Unfortunately, many buildings have no such trending abilities. Using loggers, sensors and a methodology, BRT-like measures developed by CUNY Building Performance Laboratory identifies operational improvements across building systems. This seminar describes CUNY BPL’s experience creating and applying solutions to many building systems; it also speaks to the potential for automation to reduce operator effort in acquiring recommendations for operational improvements.

4  Commissioning in the Cloud

Kris Kinney, Highwoods Properties
A case study is examined where the information gap between construction and operations was successfully bridged at the commissioning phase of a project utilizing a tablet-based information portal on the owner's cloud. In this example, operational information which is critical to thermal comfort and energy performance was effectively communicated and leveraged a video archive. The necessity of this communication occurs not only at the commissioning phase and project turnover to operations but also serves as a useful information resource for the life of the facility and its systems.

9:45 AM-10:45 AM
Debate 2
Commissioning Agents For Smart Buildings: Whose Side Am I On?

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
203AB (Long Beach Convention)
Moderator: Frank Shadpour, P.E., SC Engineers, Inc.
Presenters: Frank Shadpour, P.E., SC Engineers, Inc. , Barry Bridges, P.E., NV5 and George Rogers, RQ Construction
Technical Committee: 1.4 Control Theory and Application
Sponsor: HVAC Security TG2
CoSponsor: 7.5 Smart Building Systems
The commissioning agent's role is to ensure that the Owner's Project Requirements (OPR) are met; however, the commissioning agent (CxA) is frequently hired by the Contractor. The Owner’s goal is a high-performance building; the Contractor's goal is maintaining budget. Does this relationship pit the commissioning agent against the owner? This debate covers the benefits of commissioning from an Owner's perspective and a Contractor's perspective. Does the Owner get a high-performance building when the commissioning agent is hired by the Contractor or does an Owner-hired CxA guarantee better results? An Owner and Contractor debate lessons learned from commissioning smart building controls.

  Presentation Upload for Debate and Forms for Shadpour

Frank Shadpour, P.E., SC Engineers, Inc.

  Forms for Barry Bridges

Barry Bridges, P.E., NV5

  Forms for Rogers

George Rogers, RQ Construction

  Forms for Farrow

Daniel Farrow, Palomar Health

11:00 AM-12:00 PM
Forum 4
What the FPT Is Commissioning for Design Build Projects?

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
103AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Will Mak, P.E., Cyclone Energy Group
Technical Committee: 7.9 Building Commissioning
CoSponsor: 7.2 HVAC&R Construction & Design Build Technologies
Methods for commissioning building projects with traditional design-bid-build delivery methods are well established. However, projects using the design build delivery method have become more popular and require a different approach for implementing the commissioning process on these types of projects. This forum opens the discussion between engineers, architects, contractors and owners on how design build projects should be commissioned. The goals after the forum are to develop a guideline on commissioning for design build projects and to conduct a seminar / workshop on the guideline at a future ASHRAE conference.

11:00 AM-12:00 PM
Workshop 8
Opaque OPRs Produce Obscure Objectives

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
201B (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: E. Mitchell Swann, P.E., MDCSystems
Technical Committee: 7.3 Operation and Maintenance Management
CoSponsor: 1.7 Business, Management & General Legal Education
To have a successful project it is essential to bridge the communication gap among owner, designer and commissioning provider. This workshop focuses on the elements of an effective Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR). Attendees, working in small groups, will craft a section of an OPR in response to a demanding yet visionary owner. The groups will then come together, compare their OPRs, and engage in an interactive discussion designed to meld the best ideas into a single high-quality document.

1  Owner's Perspective of an OPR

Wayne Webster, Princess Towers, Inc.
This workshop includes the building owner's perspective on the definition of OPR, why the OPR is important and summarizes their responsibilities in developing the OPR. Key points to be discussed are: The communication gap between Owner, Designer and Cx provider; Who takes (or should take) the lead? The audience will break into small groups and provide an opaque OPR. The Owner and Cx provider will have a pre-written script and play the role of an Owner of a commercial office building. The groups will interview the Owner and rewrite the section of the OPR to reflect the actual needs of the Owner. The Cx provider will then present an example of an effective OPR, stimulate open discussion and questions and compare the example OPR against a selected group's document.

2  Cx Provider's Perspective of an OPR

Mina Agarabi, P.E., Agarabi Engineering PLLC
An experienced commissioning (Cx) provider shares their perspective on the definition of OPR, why the OPR is important and summarizes the essential components. Key points to be discussed are: A clear definition of the Owner's expectations reduces the risk of unclear intent, unfulfilled expectations and unnecessary disputes; An OPR that reflects the actual needs of the Owner, the users or occupants, and facility staff is needed for Cx to be successful.

11:00 AM-12:00 PM
Seminar 29
Urban-Scale Building Energy Modeling, Part 5

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
101A (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Bass Abushakra, Ph.D., United States Military Academy
Technical Committee: 1.5 Computer Applications
CoSponsor: 4.7 Energy Calculations
Development of urban-scale building energy models is becoming increasingly tractable for many applications including city-wide energy supply/demand strategies, urban development planning, electrical grid stability, and urban resilience. This seminar has assembled several researchers with capabilities in the field of urban-scale energy models to discuss an overview of the field as well as the data, algorithms, workflow, and practical challenges addressed in their applications involving creation of useful models of individual buildings at the scale of a city, urban, or metropolitan area.

1  Automatic Building Energy Model Creation (AutoBEM)

Joshua New, Ph.D., Oak Ridge National Lab
National labs, universities, and industry are all developing significant capabilities for urban-scale building energy modeling…once a virtual city is constructed. To construct the models, most rely on local data sources that work at the scale of a city or county (such as a tax assessor’s database) or flyover of the area of interest, but do not use data sources or algorithms that would scale to areas the size of a metropolis, state, or entire country. This presentation will show recent advances in scalable capabilities for automatically creating fully-articulated OpenStudio and EnergyPlus models of individual buildings for any area of interest.

2  Simplified Estimation of Energy Use Intensity Based on Building Façade Features

Joon-Ho Choi, Ph.D., University of Southern California
A building’s façade is a major element that accounts for 70% of building energy performance. Compared with the internal mechanical system and operation schedule, façade features information is relatively easy to obtain from the visual aspects of a building. Instead of using traditional and complicated simulation methods, a mathematical model can be established to estimate EUI baselines based on sufficient existing building practices data. This prediction modeling approach will provide a more realistic EUI estimation tool for calculating an energy use baseline and will enable real-time energy usage monitoring and management of each targeted building.

3  Retrofitting District-Scale Buildings to Cut Energy Use By 50%: A Case Study

Yixing Chen, Ph.D., LBNL
Tianzhen Hong, Ph.D., LBNL
Buildings in cities consume 30 to 70% of the cities’ total primary energy. Retrofitting the existing building stock to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy use is necessary to reduce green-house-gas emissions and mitigate climate change. We present a case study on district-scale energy retrofit analysis using CityBES, a web-based toolkit developed by LBNL. Two retrofit scenarios are studied: evaluating energy savings and cost of typical energy conservation measures (ECMs) for a portfolio of hundreds of buildings in downtown San Francisco; and optimizing a package of ECMs that can achieve 50% energy savings for all buildings in the district.

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

8:00 AM-9:30 AM
Seminar 37
Water Treatment: The Overlooked Aspect of Commissioning Hydronic Systems

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
203AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Helen Cerra, ChemTreat, Inc.
Technical Committee: 3.6 Water Treatment
CoSponsor: 8.6 Cooling Towers and Evaporative Condensers
Proper water treatment is a key aspect of hydronic system performance and asset life. Commissioning water treatment systems when water is first introduced into a hydronic system provides corrosion protection, extended asset life and prevents other damage due to premature failure. These presentations describe commissioning requirements for various hydronic systems from a water treatment perspective.

1  Commissioning of Your Steam System's Water Treatment Program

Todd Cornwell, AFCO
New steam boilers and hot water boilers need special attention paid to the application of water treatment during the startup/commissioning process. Proper cleaning and passivation during the startup will prevent equipment failures or poor energy performance. Steps to prevent mineral scale and corrosion should be implemented as soon as water is introduced into these systems. This seminar provides guidance (with checklist) on the steps required to prepare the boiler systems for service.

2  Proper Commissioning of Your Cooling System's Water Treatment Program

Dan Weimar, Chem-Aqua, Inc.
New cooling towers, evaporative condensers, fluid coolers, piping and chiller equipment must be commissioned properly to control waterside problems that will reduce equipment life, efficiency, reliability and safety. Proper startup and commissioning is especially important to reduce the potential for white rust corrosion in new cooling water systems containing galvanized metallurgy. This seminar explains the proper commissioning of new or retrofitted cooling water system construction projects and how to avoid costly damages and potential litigation due to uncontrolled water chemistry.

3  Potable Water and Other Indoor Aerosolizing Systems

Tim Keane, Legionella Risk Management Inc.
When building water system Legionnaires' disease outbreaks occur no matter how long after construction or renovation, commonly those involved in design and construction are named parties should subsequent litigation occur. And when building water system Legionnaires' disease outbreaks occur within one year of construction or renovation almost always those involved in design and construction are primary named parties should subsequent litigation occur. This seminar covers simple and easy steps to validate that critical commissioning steps of aerosolizing water systems have been completed and are properly documented to insure compliance with ASHRAE 188 and industry best practices.

9:45 AM-10:45 AM
Seminar 39
Chiller Retrofit Case Study: From Evaluating Options to Optimizing Operation

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
203AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Annie Smith, P.E., Ross & Baruzzini
Technical Committee: 7.6 Building Energy Performance
This seminar dives deep into evaluating the options for a replacement chiller retrofit. Options were evaluated using a feasibility study, a data-driven energy model, lifecycle cost analysis and detailed trend analysis. After installation, controls optimization strategies were used to bring further value to the project to ensure proper efficient operation and energy savings. Lessons learned concerning construction oversight, performance-based commissioning and the approach to the controls optimization are presented.

1  Case Study: Critically Evaluating Replacement Chiller Options beyond Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Edmund Wong, P.E., Arup
This presentation covers the approach, methodology and lessons learned of a performance-based chiller retrofit project. The performance evaluation included a life-cycle cost assessment of replacement options that involved a data-driven energy model and an accurate understanding of the baseline energy consumption in the existing condition through a building survey and detailed trend analysis. Lessons learned from construction oversight and performance-based commissioning is also presented.

9:45 AM-10:45 AM
Seminar 40
Delivering a Successful Critical Facility/Data Center Project by Fostering a Healthy Relationship between the Owner, Engineer and Commissioning Agent

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
201A (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Nick Gangemi, Northern Air Systems
Technical Committee: 9.9 Mission Critical Facilities, Data Centers, Technology Spaces and Electronic Equipment
CoSponsor: 7.9 Building Commissioning
The presentations in this session discuss the independence as well as interdependencies between the Engineer of Record (EOR) and the Commissioning Agent (CxA) in partnering with the Owner to deliver a successful critical facility project. The presentations address both Greenfield and new construction projects as well as upgrades and renovations to existing facilities. The session presents both the EOR and CxA perspectives and discusses what information each requires from the other as well as what decisions and information both require from the Owner. The presentations will address all project phases of the project.

1  The EOR’s Perspective on Delivering a Successful Critical Facility/Data Center Project By Fostering a Healthy Relationship with the Owner and Commissioning Agent

Vali Sorell, P.E., Sorell Engineering
This presentation includes a discussion regarding the role of the EOR in bridging the process that begins with the owner, continues through design, construction and commissioning and ends with the delivery of a fully tested and operational facility. The discussion includes issues linking the EOR and the CxA, including how and when the CxA should be introduced into the design process, how the design and specifications should provide “hooks” to clearly designate to the contractors and subcontractors their own responsibilities to the CxA Team and the CxA Process and what can go wrong when those issues are omitted.

2  The CxA’s Perspective on Delivering a Successful Critical Facility/Data Center Project by Fostering a Healthy Relationship with the Owner and Engineer

Terry Rodgers, Primary Integration Solutions Inc
The presentation includes a discussion regarding the role of the commissioning agent and what information is required from both the Owner and EOR to facilitate a successful commissioning program. It also discusses how and why the CxA must remain independent of the EOR while also teaming with the EOR and the entire project team to facilitate a win-win outcome. The presentation explains how expanding the traditional scope of commissioning can be made to easily include leading the effort to deliver the needed FM/O&M programs, procedures and training.

11:00 AM-12:30 PM
Seminar 44
Optimization of Existing Buildings Is Much More than Retro Commissioning

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
202AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Wade H. Conlan, P.E., Hanson Professional Services
Technical Committee: 7.9 Building Commissioning
CoSponsor: 7.6 Building Energy Performance
Optimization of the building systems through the Retro Commissioning Process starts well before the CxP interrogates the BAS system and doesn't end when the report is issued. This seminar starts by working through the creation of an energy roadmap for your building or campus to plan your savings. A case study on a 30,000 ton chiller plant serving a campus expands on that optimization process and shows real implementation and results of the RetroCx process. Finally, the seminar discusses the process on finding, and more importantly, implementing energy savings measures with buy-in from the Owner and Operators.

1  Campus Energy Management: You Need a Plan

Nathaniel Boyd, P.E., Hanson Professional Services
Taking on an energy management program of a large campus or portfolio of properties can be a daunting task. Rather than “putting out fires” by approaching projects independently, this study analyzes a strategic, deliberate approach to achieving institutional energy cost reduction through a repeatable, stepwise roadmap plan that involves financial planning, needs assessments, prioritization and implementation of audits, retro-commissioning and measures. Setting up your plan allows you to actually predict the impact of the optimization process.

2  How to RetroCommission a 30,000 ton Chiller Plant

Lee Riback, McKinstry
Seriously, how do you approach RetroCx of a 30,000 ton chiller plant? We will take a deep dive into a University of Arizona campus chilled water plant that includes 22 chillers and 300 ice storage tanks. The discussion covers the process and findings of the work which includes the load management and chiller staging to improve plant efficiency. It also covers the field modifications completed at the plant to implement the RetroCx measures. Finally it discusses the OnGoing Monitoring based Cx that has further optimized the plant.

3  Taking the "Retro" out of Retro-Commissioning

Benjamin Skelton, P.E., Cyclone Energy Group
How you look for optimization opportunities and present the value takes special care to ensure buy-in from owners and operators. This study focuses on how to hunt down measures, present them with confidence, ensure successful implementation and verify results. Specific examples from large commercial buildings are presented.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

9:45 AM-10:45 AM
Seminar 56
Urban-scale Building Energy Modeling, Part 6

Commissioning: Optimizing New and Existing Buildings and their Operation
102AB (Long Beach Convention)
Chair: Joshua New, Ph.D., Oak Ridge National Lab
Technical Committee: 1.5 Computer Applications
CoSponsor: 4.7 Energy Calculations
Development of urban-scale building energy models is becoming increasingly tractable for many applications including city-wide energy supply/demand strategies, urban development planning, electrical grid stability and urban resilience. This seminar has assembled several researchers with capabilities in the field of urban-scale energy models to discuss an overview of the field as well as the data, algorithms, workflow and practical challenges addressed in their applications involving creation of useful models of individual buildings at the scale of a city, urban or metropolitan area.

1  Agent Based Modeling to Estimate the Adoption of Energy Efficient Building Technologies

Ralph Muehleisen, Ph.D., P.E., Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Agent based modeling (ABM) is a bottom-up method of modeling complex systems that simulates the actions and interactions of autonomous agents. ABM is being used to look at consumer adoption of technologies ranging from cosmetics to electric vehicles and are often used as a replacement for diffusion models. This seminar presents the use of ABM to estimate the adoption of energy efficient building technologies. In the model, building owners make decisions based on a wide variety of economic and non-economic factors. A study of the nationwide adoption of hot water heating technology is shown.

2  Virtual Reality UBEM

Drury Crawley, Ph.D., Bentley Systems, Inc.
With the advent of urban scale reality models, creating community, campus or Urban Building Energy Models (UBEM) has become as easy as a few hours of capturing photos with a drone. Combining the virtual model with benchmarking, facility, utility, management data and BIM models allows data to be easily queried. This presentation demonstrates several examples of how UBEM can visualize and report on benchmarking, utility and facility management data at the community, campus or urban scale. Virtual navigation of a campus and several cities will demonstrate how UBEM can be used to measure, analyze and report readily available urban data.

Register now!